Oracle looking badass.
Did you know that the East and the West have magically different cosmologies? Well, the New York Times Art Review would like you to. The Whole Earth Catalog: a Prequel, by Ken Johnson, reviews a show I haven't seen and am very unlikely to see. I'd encourage you to read the article yourself, but well, I want you to keep your eyes.

oh, ken johnson, no. )
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
I don't remember the fall of the Berlin Wall. (To be fair, I wasn't even one at the time.) My associations with the Wall are the CHECKPOINT CHARLIE sign a friend of mine had in his dorm room, the East Berlin-themed restaurant in the Mission, and the Soviet-era map we had on my fifth-grade classroom wall. ("Is that all Russia?" someone asked the teacher. He stared at it and said, "You know, I hadn't even noticed it was wrong until now. No, hon, not anymore." I was extremely disappointed; that would obviously have made an awesome coloring section in geography.)

I do remember, however, the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. )
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
This is kind of a rehash of another post of mine you might have read. But the provocation is new, all new.

The Telegraph recently published an article headlined "God is not the Creator, claims academic." Besides the obvious need for subquotation marks in that title, it should be noted that the academic -- Ellen van Wolde -- is not in fact making an atheist argument but a biblical one. The word "bara'", she says, means not "to create" but "to separate." This, says the Telegraph, means that a mighty blow has been struck against the Traditional Interpretation of God.

i'm betting you can guess where this is going. )
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
So I'm reading about the history of the Philippine-American war. And the only way I can do it without actually getting so angry I put my fist through a wall is to listen to "The Ballad of Czolgosz" on repeat.

If he had to choose between the writer of that letter and the writer of that bedroom scene, Grant considered, he would choose the writer of the letter every time, whatever either of them had done besides. )

The Person Sitting in Darkness is almost sure to say: "There is something curious about this – curious and unaccountable. There must be two Americas: one that sets the captive free, and one that takes a once-captive's new freedom away from him, and picks a quarrel with him with nothing to found it on; then kills him to get his land."

...We should say to him: "...True, we have crushed a deceived and confiding people; we have turned against the weak and the friendless who trusted us; we have stamped out a just and intelligent and well-ordered republic; we have stabbed an ally in the back and slapped the face of a guest; we have bought a Shadow from an enemy that hadn't it to sell; we have robbed a trusting friend of his land and his liberty; we have invited our clean young men to shoulder a discredited musket and do bandit's work under a flag which bandits have been accustomed to fear, not to follow; we have debauched America's honor and blackened her face before the world; but each detail was for the best. We know this. The Head of every State and Sovereignty in Christendom and ninety per cent. of every legislative body in Christendom, including our Congress and our fifty State Legislatures, are members not only of the church, but also of the Blessings-of-Civilization Trust. This world-girdling accumulation of trained morals, high principles, and justice, cannot do an unright thing, an unfair thing, an ungenerous thing, an unclean thing. It knows what it is about. Give yourself no uneasiness; it is all right."

Now then, that will convince the Person. You will see. It will restore the Business. Also, it will elect the Master of the Game to the vacant place in the Trinity of our national gods; and there on their high thrones the Three will sit, age after age, in the people's sight, each bearing the Emblem of his service: Washington, the Sword of the Liberator; Lincoln, the Slave's Broken Chains; the Master, the Chains Repaired.

It will give the Business a splendid new start. You will see. -- Mark Twain.


A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
I'd like to use this opportunity to introduce a probably short series called Emma explains months-old xkcd comics Emma Explains Why Science Reporting Makes Her Want to Beat Her Head Into A Wall Repeatedly Until She Can No Longer Hear the BBC, or "Screw the Tuesday Times" for short.



So, correlation and causation.

see also: ben goldacre and dara o'briain )
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
Today, I drove down the coast to Santa Cruz and back again. It's not the longest I've ever driven, or the longest I've ever driven on my own, or the longest I've ever driven on my own in this car -- but it might be the longest I've ever gone just for sheer pleasure. I spent most of my adolescence avoiding driving school with every hemp fiber of my earth-loving body. San Francisco has an excellent public transit system, I pointed out, accurately (although one which, due to its frequent bankruptcy, has just made my blog name obsolete by hiking the price to eight quarters.) It's cheaper, it's easier, it gives you a better sense of self-righteousness, and who wants to visit the boonies anyway?

Well, me, it turns out.

I tell you now, those faint of heart and fond of buses, they're not kidding, driving is a joy. Particularly with the right soundtrack. "O Valencia!" has gotten me in more near-crashes than the dark and my cell phone put together because when it comes on I always end up doing ninety, whichever lane I happen to be in. My car, which has steadily been collecting dents, rust, dirt, and coffee cups, puts up with all of this with good grace. I suppose I should clean it out or at least clean it off, but I'm holding out the hope that one day it'll molt and suddenly I'll have a Maserati.

I've driven up to Oregon before and I'll be driving down to Los Angeles at the end of the summer, which may go some way to scratching the itch that comes over me whenever I see signs for 80 to take it straight through to Chicago at least. California is weird. I mean, besides the fact that our state government appears to be held together with spit and denial and besides the fact that we contain both the Bay Area and Los Angeles, not to mention San Diego and Yosemite; I drove for an hour and a half today and saw nothing but California nor any sign of anything but California. You can't drive five minutes in Chicago without seeing a sign for Iowa, and it's not like Illinois is a little state. The effect produced is that of a massive island, kind of like the early maps, though on most islands you don't pass through three different climates in an hour and a half.

I think I would probably like New Zealand.
Oracle looking badass.
Dreamwidth's autosave really needs a booster shot.

I planned to make this post in celebration of the release of The City and The City, China Mieville's latest, about a city that is actually two, one in this world and one not quite. Circumstances intervened -- namely, the Supreme Court ruling that Prop 8 is constitutional, an act which does not surprise me but does depress me. It's the sensible legal decision, perhaps the only legal decision, but it makes things very hard.

So, instead of a post where I compare and contrast Star Trek and Terminator's future San Franciscos, I'm just going to talk about Terminator's.

I promise it's related; I don't promise it's unpretentious. Spoilers. )
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
I'm reading an excellent book right now called the Stories of English. It's informed me of a number of things, not all of which are interesting enough to discuss in the form of a blog post (did you know that pairs of loan words like 'ward'/'guard' show off the w/gu shift in early French? Did you know that a lot of legal doublets like 'will and testament' are due to using an early word and then a Latinate word, just to be clear? Did you know that Old English was probably deeply affected by the political standing of the Danelaw, but that we don't know what that standing was, exactly? Did you know that basically any piece of trivia will interest me if you put "linguistic shift" somewhere in the sentence?)

The book's basic point is that English is a heavily dialectical language, now more than ever, and that the general story of Old English [Germanic] --> Middle English [Norman/Latinate] --> Modern English [Awesome!] is as false as all easily definable narratives, political, linguistic, historical, scientific, or otherwise. This is basically the kind of premise that makes me wet my pants with joy. I love the sense of deep history that the book brings in, the sense that England-before-the-Anglo-Saxons is a rich and varied set of provinces, the sense that England-before-William-the-Conqueror is a rich and varied country ... I'm hoping that when I get to colonial dialects, we'll get to hear some of the same sense of depth. From how he's treating Scots English, I suspect we will.

musing on historiography )

Anyway, to try to indicate some of what he's talking about, I will relay something that may only be of interest to linguists. Crystal comments that there's some belief that linguistic purity can only be found in Good Anglo-Saxon Words. George Orwell was particularly enamored of this idea. In fact, Crystal says, plenty of Good Anglo-Saxon Words are not at all Anglo-Saxon, they're just old. Linguistic borrowing from Latin gave us cup, wall, wine, city, sack, camp, sign, fork, master, tower, strap, and school. And honestly, if you want to see how deep Latin words are embedded in the English consciousness, try one of the words frequently lumped in with the good, strong, four-letter Anglo-Saxon words: cock.
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
Patricia Wrede recently wrote a book called "The Thirteenth Child," which is coming out soon from Tor, featuring an America that was never inhabited by American Indians. People are angry. I'm not going to touch on the many, many reasons that it's not a healthy premise for a book, because I can link you to many other versions of that.

I am going to say that Lois McMaster Bujold has been commenting on the issue, and her latest has been an assertion that talking on the internet is slanderous and silly (we have no evidence that the book treats things carelessly --
you know, except for the many reports from people with ARCs that yes, it is a book that has a hole at its heart. Why don't we donate to American Indian tribal charities instead?)

It is a hilarious complaint. Her targets are some of the most active, involved members of anti-racist activities around. [livejournal.com profile] karnythia founded Verb Noire and is working at Operation PUSH. [livejournal.com profile] kate_nepveu and [livejournal.com profile] popelizbet sent fans of color to WisCon with a fundraiser whose runoff went to the Carl Brandon Society. In fact, this entire post contains only constructive responses to RaceFail. Furthermore, a number of the fans she's castigating for not doing Real Work for the American Indian/First Nations Communities are tribally enrolled. They are doing Real Work for the American Indian/First Nations Communities every day with their friends and families. And not to bring the haunted specter of class into this, but of the people she addresses who do not donate, some of them are not able to spend a dollar more than they need to.

But besides the many, many reasons that it is unwise to castigate an active community of radical people of color (to borrow [livejournal.com profile] delux_vivens's phrase) and anti-racists for "not doing enough," why do so many fiction writers complain that we're paying too much attention to fiction? How many of them have, in other contexts, assured us that stories are what make us human? How many of them have, in other contexts, talked about the power of words? Do words only have power when they want them to? Do they honestly think that words and that fiction only serve the purpose they were initially intended to serve, and do they think that such purposes are unimportant?
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
First, a link to THIS by us' latest petition. "THIS by us" is a protest work that has been put up on the walls of the University of Minnesota school for dance, in reaction to attitudes of racism in the community. The "THIS" team has made concrete demands which have not been met by a faculty supposedly committed to diversity and social justice.

And, though there have been no very recent developments, here's a link to Racebending's video protest against the whitewashing of Avatar: the Last Airbender and their petition.

"THIS by us" got coverage in Gawker labeling it in dismissive terms as the work of -- oh -- the privileged class enjoying their privileges, to quote the Philadelphia Story. The Racebending protests have gotten admiring comments from Margaret freaking Cho, and some small coverage in news outlets, but there seems to be no real feeling among the larger fanbase that the protest will do anything. In both cases the protests are chided for being

  • vague -- when they present concrete demands. THIS by us's list is here. It contains specific immediate responses that they desire (for example, Make a public and official statement, in writing, regarding the departmental stance on criticism of official policy and faculty actions.) Racebending, being a protest in the sense of a boycott, declares that strongly at the top of the page and in its FAQ. Its goal is to get the information out.
  • ineffectual -- especially when no alternative is presented. Racebending may or may not change the casting or cancel the production of the ridiculous live action adaptation of Avatar, but sitting on your ass and buying tickets for it won't do so, as seen by the remarkable impact of the protests of the Dragonball Z movie. THIS by us has already roused discussion and attention.
  • slanderous/illegal -- particularly when presenting provable facts. The characters of A:tlA inhabit an Asian world, for which Racebending has provided enormous quantities of evidence. In response, Viacom launched an attack on their merch store, which was selling legal material, by claiming it was "copyright infrigement." Uh huh. THIS by us has been accused of pointing fingers cruelly -- I can't tell if it made teachers cry from how honest it was or how meeeeean it was, but either way, its work was primarily to post discussions of the racism in the dance program at the school. If your students of color are telling you that you're failing them as a teacher, it isn't their fault, nor are they slandering your good name unless you can prove that they are incorrect -- which the teachers, broadly speaking, cannot.

    and, most frequently of all,
  • ridiculous.

    I guess, if you forget the massive weight of yellowface and the history Hollywood has of whitewashing its leads, then you can make an argument that the Racebending protest doesn't matter. You could, if you were willing to ignore the impact that a mainstream children's movie has on the development of young children looking for heroes, argue that it's just a movie. But I fail to understand how you could argue that students who feel rejected, overlooked, beaten down, and excluded by their own major program are ridiculous. Their concerns are real. They are not art; they are not trying to be avant-garde. They are anonymous because they could be hurt otherwise -- and because they are being hurt right now. There is nothing ridiculous about it.
These accusations are not new. They are leveled at every protest, every attempt to chip away at the massive wall that is systemic racism. They are brought out no matter how appropriate or inappropriate, dusted off, given a good airing, then put back in the box. They serve an important purpose. If you can say that a protest is vague, ineffectual, illegal, and ridiculous, you can ignore what it's protesting. You can ignore that someone in front of you is being hurt. You can ignore that someone in front of you is jumping up and down and waving a sign not to get meaningless attention, but to stop your bulldozer from plowing right over them.

These are concrete, important, legal and serious accusations. Please give them a little of your time.
A ludicrous musical score.
In the inaugural edition of the Musical Overanalyzer, I'm going to focus on a life lesson that I consider to be fundamental to any budding songwriter and to any lover of music. I am going to do this through the medium of an All-American Rejects song. If this conjunction does not sound appealing to you, you should maybe bow out of this blog right now.

rhyming, or, why tyson ritter can be catchy and yet incompetent )



I've put in a somewhat nifty piece of code that puts a "check" next to visited links; let me know if this is acting up for anyone. It should only apply to in-text links, not to usernames or headers.
A cropped picture of a quarter, heads-up.
And who are you?

Emma, aka Six Quarters or SQ, is a city/activist/literary/music/nerdblogger who hails from San Francisco and has a lot of time on her hands.

What can I expect out of these here parts?

Based on my job description, I imagine you can expect me to write about the use of Melville quotes in the Britney song they were playing at the Anonymous protest down on Polk Street.

Haven't I seen you somewhere before?

No. No you haven't. And if you did, it was an illusion, and I was somewhere else at the time. Or: please don't bring real-life or other online identities of mine into the comment section of the blog. My goal is to preserve my pseudonymity within the confines of the Google search.

What are the house rules?

Only two: be careful and party hard. Since the second is self-explanatory, a quick rundown on the first: this is a safe space and I will not be tolerant of those who I think are endangering that. Though I am unlikely to delete or screen anything that isn't blatantly a troll, I will not be nice.

Where should I introduce myself?

Right here!

How do I comment?

You can either get a Dreamwidth account (very cheap!), or you can comment using an OpenID, or you can comment anonymously, although anon comments should sign their names. Comments here are threaded; if you'd rather read it flat, append ?view=flat to the end of the page's url.

Why Six Quarters?

Bus fare on MUNI.

Profile

Six Quarters

January 2010

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Feb. 10th, 2010 01:26 am